Martina Hingis vs Anna-Lena Groenefeld Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W L W L L L
Form
W L L L L W L L W LHead-2-Head: Hingis 1 - 0 Groenefeld
They have played 2 sets in total, with Hingis winning 2 and Groenefeld winning 0. The last match between Hingis and Groenefeld was at the Zurich Open - Zurich, 16-10-2006, First, I.hard with Martina Hingis getting the victory 6-0 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Martina Hingis | 1 |
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 0 |
Zurich Open - Zurich(16-10-2006)
6
0
7
5
| Hingis | Stats | Groenefeld |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 4 | Highest Rank | 14 |
| 44 | Age | 39 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 43 | Titles | 11 |
| 80% (557-137) | Career Total W/L | 57% (265-201) |
| $1,227,965 | Career Prize Money | $836,300 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Pegula VS Uchijima PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Alexandrova VS Kasatkina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Hingis VS Groenefeld H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 7-5 |
Stats 
Martina Hingis
Player
Anna-Lena Groenefeld
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
9
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
82%
(
28 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
28 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
75
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Hingis VS Groenefeld H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 5 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 61% (34/56) | 1st Serve % | 61% (43/70) |
| 61% (34/56) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (43/70) |
| 82% (28/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (23/43) |
| 33% (4/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 6% (4/70) | Return Points Win % | 446% (250/56) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Martina Hingis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 4-3(3) 4-1 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Urszula Radwanska
Player
Martina Hingis
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
65 of
97)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Agnieszka Radwanska
Player
Martina Hingis
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Shuai Peng
Player
Martina Hingis
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Hingis
Player
Tian-Tian Sun
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Victoria Azarenka
Player
Martina Hingis
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
57 of
84)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
47 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martina Hingis
Player
Pauline Parmentier
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Hingis
Player
Mathilde Johansson
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
45%
(
17 of
38)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sania Mirza
Player
Martina Hingis
57%
(
50 of
87)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Patty Schnyder
Player
Martina Hingis
67%
(
66 of
99)
1st Serve %
74%
(
62 of
84)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
43 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
100
Total Points Won
83
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Anna-Lena Groenefeld Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Evgeniya Rodina
Player
Anna-Lena Groenefeld
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Groenefeld
Player
Kathrin Woerle
53%
(
70 of
132)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
1
Aces
6
12
Double Faults
4
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
44%
(
27 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
45%
(
60 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
110
Total Points Won
111
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Urszula Radwanska
Player
Anna-Lena Groenefeld
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
0
Total Points Won
0
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Renata Voracova
Player
Anna-Lena Groenefeld
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
10
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tetyana Arefyeva
Player
Anna-Lena Groenefeld
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Groenefeld
Player
Isabella Holland
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80% (557/137) | Win/Loss | 57% (265/201) |
| 76% (1177/373) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (588/470) |
| 62% (8368/5237) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (5076/4598) |
| 80% (274/68) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (103/83) |
| 82% (119/27) | Clay Win/Loss | 66% (128/67) |
| 81% (132/30) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44% (31/39) |
| 79% (23/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 20% (3/12) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 145 | Aces Total | 643 |
| 0.03 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 210 | Total Double Faults | 994 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 281.93 | Average Opponent Rank | 491.72 |
| 65% (4012/6140) | 1st Serve % | 56% (6972/12439) |
| 62% (2515/4034) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (4661/6999) |
| 51% (1091/2140) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2483/5489) |
| 48% (432/893) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (618/1379) |
| 48% (3002/6266) | Return Points Win % | 44% (5557/12549) |
| 84% (145/28) | Slam W/L | 51% (28/27) |
| 82% (130/29) | Masters W/L | 50% (34/34) |
| 82% (18/4) | Cups W/L | 61% (11/7) |
| 80% (189/46) | Main Tour W/L | 51% (103/98) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 90% (9/1) | Challenger W/L | 71% (84/35) |
| 60% (9/6) | Futures W/L | 100% (5/0) |
| 80% (552/686) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (262/460) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 67% (53/79) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (45/97) |
| 60% (97/162) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (71/129) |
| 93% (548/511) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (260/231) |
| 7% (548/36) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (260/29) |
| 30% (145/44) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (206/35) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
